Tuesday, April 19, 2016

So Long, Farewell

As the semester comes to a close, so does my time in the class Writing in the Disciplines. Even though this course was not exactly what I was expecting, I sure did learn a lot during the sixteen weeks of the semester. The activities we participated in included writing a summary of a documentary, weekly blog posts, exercises from our textbook Just the Facts by Michael Biggs, analysis of police scenes, and concluded with mock interviews. In my proceeding thoughts I hope to describe how this course has impacted my skills and abilities going forward in a career in the Criminal Justice field.

The documentary summary assignment allowed me to get a feel for what it is like to document a series of events in chronological order. I know this is a skill that can be applicable to writing reports for a case. This assignment also refined my writing skills and made me gain more confidence in my writing skills. 

The weekly blog posts left room for a little more creativity when responding to guided reflection topics. Not only was the professor going to see our views and thoughts, but our peers could do so as well. Writing the blogs enabled me to get my views across in a respectable manner. 

The textbook exercises helped to apply what I read on the page to a real world experience. It is one thing to read information on a page, and another to understand and apply what you read. 

Analyzing police scenes reinforced the policy and procedures we read about in our textbook. The scenes also demonstrated just how fast a call can escalate and the quick thinking officers must do on a daily basis. 

Finally the mock interviews we did in groups allowed us to put together all that we had learned about investigations and interviews. We were able to come up with questions and interview our peers. The activity made everyone involved pay attention to their body langue,as well as, their tone of voice.

Overall there were lessons to be learned from taking this class. However, I wish I was able to get more out of this class. We focused a lot on the writing process and what it takes to be a good writer, but not enough on the actual documents or scenarios that we would encounter in the Criminal Justice field. 

Sunday, April 10, 2016

Scene Study

The video I watched consisted of a truck driver being pulled over for being in the left hand lane of a highway. The driver explained to the sergeant that he had done so because a car kept pulling in front of him and slowing down. The twist of the whole incident occurred when the sergeant told the driver if he was the officer in this situation what would he do. The driver was so flustered and caught of guard he did not know wha to saw. In the end the officer let him go on his way without issuing him a ticket. 

When an officer pulls someone over they usually have in mind whether they are going to write a ticket or not. In this case, after hearing the driver admit he was in the wrong and explain the reasons why he broke the law, the sergeant decided to not write him a ticket. Turning the tables and asking what the driver would do if he was the officer is also a common practice by officers. The officers want to see what the driver thinks ought to happen. If the officer  agrees with the suggestion they will often do it. 

Sunday, April 3, 2016

Class Interview Reflection



The definition of interview according to our textbook, is to "find the truth in the form of information received in a legal and professional manner. " While watching the two groups interview, I only saw one interview and one interrogation. An interrogation is "more focused then an interview and has a heightened sense of anxiety and tension."

My observations of the first interview include:
     #1
         The interviewers became really aggressive early on in the interview
         The interviews did not establish a rapport with the subject before asking the hard questions
         The interviewers seemed biased from the beginning and instead of getting information from the subject, they seemed to be    
           fishing for a confession. 
         The interviewers reacted to the answers the subject gave. 
         The interviews asked a lot of yes/no questions 

My observations of the second interview include:
     #2
        The interviewer asked basic questions first
        The interviewer asked questions that were answerable in short answers
        The interviewer built a rapport at the beginning of the questioning 

        The interviewer did a nice job restating the subject's answers